The mindset shift needed to transition from tech to strategy consulting
A senior product manager from Meta did her first round at Bain last month.
Seven years in big tech. A reputation inside her organisation for being the person who could untangle ambiguous product spaces. She had prepared for weeks. Dozens of cases, mock interviews, and feedback sessions.
She failed in twelve minutes.
The interviewer asked why a chain of clinics had seen margins fall. She opened a fresh sheet, mapped a user journey, listed acquisition triggers, and began connecting conversion points across touch stages.
The interviewer waited, then stopped her.
"That is not how this business works," he said.
She told me afterward that she was not confused by the case. She was confused by how quickly the room shifted.
"I kept trying to understand the system. He wanted me to understand the economics."
That gap is why so many FAANG candidates struggle. They walk into consulting interviews with instincts shaped by a world that solves problems differently.
FAANG trains you to think like a builder. You fix inefficiencies with data. You instrument behaviour. You slow decisions until you can validate them. You reduce risk through precision.
Consulting moves in the opposite direction.
The client rarely has time. Their decisions sit under a clock. Their data is incomplete. They want direction more than they want detail.
| FAANG Thinking | Consulting Thinking |
|---|---|
| Build the perfect system | Make the right decision now |
| Wait for data validation | Move with incomplete information |
| Reduce risk through precision | Provide direction under uncertainty |
| Understand the mechanism | Identify the driver |
Most FAANG candidates fail because they keep reaching for the depth that made them successful. They never notice the interviewer watching them work on parts of the problem that do not move the answer.
One candidate from Amazon spent ten minutes discussing customer cohorts in a growth problem. The interviewer only cared about whether volume or price had changed. He solved everything except the question.
Another candidate from Google explained experimentation frameworks to understand the drivers of churn. The business did not run experiments. It ran a simple membership model with fixed inputs. The interviewer asked twice to return to the economics.
A former engineer once said after a rejected McKinsey round: "I kept looking for the mechanism. They kept looking for the driver." That sentence captures the entire transition.
Every consulting case begins and ends with the economics of the business. If you cannot explain where revenue comes from and what drives cost, everything else becomes noise.
| Don't | Do |
|---|---|
| Map user journeys first | Identify revenue and cost drivers first |
| Explore interesting tangents | Stay anchored to the P&L |
In consulting, waiting for certainty is a mistake. Clients expect a point of view before all the facts are known. A clear early answer creates focus. It signals ownership.
Most real decisions are made with partial information. Interviewers are not testing how much data you can request. They are testing whether you can decide what likely matters and move forward.
Strong candidates know what they built. Stronger candidates know why it mattered. If you cannot link your work to revenue, cost, risk, or speed, its value remains unclear.
If you practice only with people who think like you, your blind spots remain untouched. Consulting rewards the ability to cut, not the ability to elaborate.
| Common Assumption | Reality |
|---|---|
| "It's about learning frameworks" | It's about unlearning habits |
| "Consulting extends product thinking" | It's a different profession entirely |
| "My intelligence will be obvious" | Intelligence is measured by speed to what matters |
Pick five accomplishments from your FAANG career. Rewrite each one in terms of revenue, cost, risk, or speed. If the outcome is not clear, rewrite again.
Do one case where you force yourself to give the recommendation first. It will feel uncomfortable. That discomfort is the signal you are rewiring instincts.
Read three business headlines. For each, state the most likely driver without researching. Train yourself to commit early.
Solve a case with a partner who interrupts you. Notice where you drift. Notice what you defend.
Do a case with only two data points. Learn to move without the safety of completeness.
Explain a business model from an industry you do not know. Focus only on revenue and cost.
Do a full mock where you are not allowed to use product or technical framing.
You will not be a consultant. But you will stop thinking like an engineer solving a product system. You will start thinking like someone guiding a business toward clarity.
The FAANG to MBB transition is not about intelligence. It is about instinct.
You already know how to solve hard problems. Consulting asks something different. It asks you to decide what matters when nothing is fully known.
Once you begin to think this way, the interview stops feeling like a case. It starts feeling like the work you came to do.
FAANG shapes thinkers. Consulting shapes deciders.
That is the shift.
Join 500+ candidates who've secured offers at McKinsey, BCG, and Bain with my proven coaching system. Stop guessing and start following a system that works.
Book Free MBB Consultation Call